The original article looks like part of the ongoing ideological web war between skeptics and progressive feminists. That’s an interesting development.
I exhort readers to keep identities small and not focus not on debunking the several over-the-top statements, but rather on the value of having an expressive person cataloging things in popularization of skeptical thought that cause a negative reaction.
IMO, the catalog is ad hominem attack, a litany of rationalizations for hating an enemy one already hates, and thereby not particularly useful (nor accurate) as a source of observed failings requiring remedy.
More specifically, the linked article appears to be complete trash. But reversed stupidity is not intelligence, so disagreeing with the article doesn’t show anti-feminists are correct.
I don’t see where buybuydandavis concluded anti-feminists are correct: or even where he mentioned anti-feminists or suggested what they might be correct about.
The original article looks like part of the ongoing ideological web war between skeptics and progressive feminists. That’s an interesting development.
IMO, the catalog is ad hominem attack, a litany of rationalizations for hating an enemy one already hates, and thereby not particularly useful (nor accurate) as a source of observed failings requiring remedy.
I do agree with the points on medicine, however.
Bullshit.
More specifically, the linked article appears to be complete trash. But reversed stupidity is not intelligence, so disagreeing with the article doesn’t show anti-feminists are correct.
I don’t see where buybuydandavis concluded anti-feminists are correct: or even where he mentioned anti-feminists or suggested what they might be correct about.